I am trying to get a query to retrieve all the posts where a specific meta_key
does not exist and then create it.
I am having problems finding those posts as the query I am testing does not seem to work.
Here is the code I am using to try to get those posts:
$args = array(
'posts_per_page' => 18,
'cat'=>1955,
'post_status'=>'publish',
'meta_query' => array(
array(
'key' => 'colors',
'compare' => 'NOT EXISTS'
),
));
query_posts($args);
This returns nothing if there are no posts with the key colors
, but returns they ids
of the posts with the key colors
whenever that key is present (the opposite of what I need). I tried with EXIST
instead but no luck.
If someone can tip me on the correct way of creating a query like the one I need I will appreciate it.
Thanks!
I did some more testing with this, and honestly can’t find a reason it wouldn’t work (unless the code above is just a snippet and the real code fits on my examples below). I did, however, discover a couple of things that might lead you in the right direction.
1) By itself, this meta query is the equivalent of “colors IS NULL”, i.e. it’ll return the posts which don’t have that key set in the postmeta table. This is the case shown above, and it should’ve worked.
2) Prior to WordPress 3.9, establishing the ‘relation’ index to ‘OR’ changes this condition. It returns the opposite. Don’t ask me why. This is especially important when doing multiple meta queries. That means that is not initially possible to do a query for posts that have ‘colors’ key set to ‘blue’ (or whatever) or not set at all. The query below will ignore the first condition and return only those that match the second condition.
3) However, we can fool WordPress into using the first condition if we set the ‘value’. It doesn’t need a relevant value (it’s ignored, as far as I know), but it needs to be set in order for the
NOT EXISTS
condition to have any effect.This was true up until WordPress 3.9. If you’re still using an older version, this is a viable workaround.
Using a custom query, this worked for me:
Adding a relation makes it work, even though there’s only one clause